|
|
|
Minnesota (Statewide)
Minnesota Rep. John Lesch, plans
to push for a state ban on
Akitas, chow chows, Rottweilers, pit bulls and wolf hybrids, or
mixed-breed dogs with any of the above traits.
String of dog attacks prompts call for ban on some breeds
6/15/2007 5:21:38 PM
Associated Press
ST. PAUL -- A state lawmaker called on his colleagues today
to make it illegal to own five breeds of dogs
he deemed a threat to public safety.
Rep. John Lesch, DFL-St. Paul, said he plans
to push next year for a state ban on Akitas, chow chows, Rottweilers,
pit bulls and wolf hybrids, or mixed-breed dogs with any of the
above traits.
"You never hear stories about roving packs of golden retrievers
attacking children in our streets," Lesch said. "But you do hear
about the pit bulls, who are responsible, according to Minnesota
statistics, for up to one-third of the vicious attacks in this state
in the past five years."
To drive home his point, Lesch appeared at a Capitol news conference
with 5-year-old Brianna Senn, whose face carried wounds from a pit
bull attack this month on St. Paul's East Side. He mentioned other
serious attacks in recent months and distributed a packet of news
clippings about them.
The dog that attacked Brianna was previously declared "potentially
dangerous" by city inspectors. Her mother, Kristina Eide, said it's
time to get tougher on such dogs.
"I would rather protect my daughter than protect an animal," she
said.
Violating the proposed law would be a misdemeanor, punishable by up
to 90 days and jail and $1,000 fines.
A half-dozen members of a group that finds homes for neglected or
abandoned Rottweilers, pit bulls and other nontraditional breeds
criticized the proposal as too difficult to enforce and unfair to
responsible dog owners.
"I don't think mass exterminating five breeds of dogs is going to
solve the problem of dog bites," said Kellie Dillner, assistant
education director with A Rotta Love Plus.
Dillner said better enforcing existing dangerous dog laws would be
more effective than enacting breed-specific bans.
The city of Denver enacted a pit bull ban in 2005. This April, three
dog owners filed a federal lawsuit over the ordinance giving them
the choice of moving out of the city or giving up their pets to have
them put to death. A least 1,110 dogs have been seized and killed
under the law, according to the lawsuit's backers.
Miami and Cincinnati are two other major cities that ban pit bulls,
according to the American Canine Foundation.
Minnesota legislators last took a serious look at the dangerous dog
issue in 2001. Another St. Paul Democrat, then-Rep. Andy Dawkins,
pushed to require microchips be implanted in dogs seized after
attacks to keep better track of them. Owners must pay the cost of
implanting the chips.
Other law changes required annual registration of dogs labeled
dangerous for past attacks. It also spelled out how animal control
authorities can go about destroying dogs
that inflict "substantial or great bodily harm" on humans.
|
|
|