California's Prop 93

 

Now is a critical time for those who oppose the radical Animal Rights agenda to make it clear to politicians that we are a powerful constituency, and that legislators who pander to the extremist AR agenda will lose their jobs. We can send letters and faxes to make our case, but what matters most is how we vote.

 

A NO vote on Proposition 93 is a vote to make sure Lloyd Levine terms out at the end of 2008. Levine is the sponsor of the infamous AB 1634 mandatory spay/neuter bill.

 

A NO vote on Proposition 93 is a vote to make sure Fabian Núñez terms out at the end of 2008. Núñez is the Speaker of the Assembly. Had Núñez not twisted arms before the "do over" vote in the Assembly, AB 1634 would have died for good last Spring.

 

A NO vote on Proposition 93 is a vote to make sure Loni Hancock terms out at the end of 2008. Hancock sponsored a failed bill to ban the several thousand year old tradition of field coursing with hounds.

 

A poll a few days ago showed Proposition 93 in a statistical

tie. Californians are waking up to the fact that Proposition 93 is

bad. Polls a few months ago had shown overwhelming support for it. But the more Californians learn about Prop 93, the less support it has.