|
|
|
Banned dogs eating up animal-control budget
(London, Ontario, Canada)
Pit bulls — banned in Ontario since 2005 — are taking a huge bite out of the
city’s animal-control budget.
Although they represent about four per cent of the city’s licenced dogs, pit
bulls chew up 25 per cent of animal-control hours.
And costs associated with handling pit bulls, including control and pound
services, total about $170,000, 10 per cent of the city’s $1.7 million
animal-control budget.
“It’s truly amazing what’s happened since 2005,” said Jay Stanford, manager
of environmental services.
“Pit bulls have basically dominated animal-control services. We’re averaging
10 service calls a day and another 10 enquiries.”
Stanford made the disclosure today at board of control in response to a
question from Controller Gina Barber about $103,000 budgeted for pit-bull
control under a new five-year contract with London Animal Care and Control.
“The reason I’m concerned is nowhere do I see what the size of the
problem is,” said Barber. “We’re being asked to
approve a contract now and get the facts later. That’s backwards.
And I have difficulty seeing growth in the
number of pit bulls. We’re going to see a diminishing
problem over time.”
Stanford explained he was preparing a report on pit bulls for next month,
but promised to provide additional information in support of the contract
before Monday’s council meeting.
In a later interview, Stanford said there are an estimated 100 unlicenced
pit bulls in the city and upwards of 300 more that could be here illegally.
One ticket is being issued every two days related to pit bulls, said
Stanford, also noting that many pit
bull-related complaints actually involve other breeds.
“People are spotting animals that are not necessarily pit bulls,” said
Stanford.
“We’re getting more calls, hearing more concerns because they are a target
breed. And when pit bulls make the news, it brings additional awareness and
concerns. So the problem is going to be with us for a number of years yet.”
The board is recommending approval of the new contract, which was lauded by
animal-welfare advocates for changes in the way the city handles stray pets.
The changes include:
— Specifying standard operating procedures, which the existing contract does
not.
— Leaving decisions about enforcement to the city, which would get all
revenue from licensing and fee renewals. The existing contract left those
decisions to London Animal Care and Control and gave it half the revenue.
— Requiring residents to turn in stray cats or dogs found in people’s
properties rather than have them collected by the company, resulting in
fewer cats in the pound.
— Focusing more resources to spay and neuter pets.
Joe Belanger is a Free Press city hall reporter.
|
|
|